Since its not code would it not be better to licence under cc by 4.0 for example.
A good place I look for licence is here Non-Software Licenses | Choose a License, and it contains short summaries of what it permits and what it disallows.
Since its not code would it not be better to licence under cc by 4.0 for example.
A good place I look for licence is here Non-Software Licenses | Choose a License, and it contains short summaries of what it permits and what it disallows.
CC-BY-SA 4.0 then, as well. i may ask jake if i can selectively license logos + assets as cc-by-sa-4.0 in the branding repo
That is possible. It would be cool to make it a flake too lol.
Trying some simple shape as a background, with a blue tone to contrast with the axolotl and remain the aquatic theme
Really liking the minimalism here. maybe a slight bg color change could be nice though. Also a light version for light mode users cough @minion cough
sips latte thanks Coded
I’ll take a look, do you know what the name of that setting may be?
Supposedly it’s under Admin > Site Settings > allowed attachment file types
, at least according to How to upload svg file for custom fonts - #3 by codinghorror - support - Discourse Meta
I thought svgs were allowed by default.
EDIT: ohhhh on the forum
Found it! Added svg to the list.
I’ve accidentally created something that looks really cool
I set the layer stroke way too high on krita and got this.
Oh that’s super good. Totally not biased due to it being a similar bg color my logo or anything though
I think the first one is slightly better. The second one pops more, but I think the bg is a little better flat than 3D