This is fair, but I’m afraid I also think the documentation for snowfall, while nice in places, is pretty mid in places. I think there’s things that could be done to reduce that learning curve a fair amount.
Without a doubt. I would consider Snowfall Lib’s documentation as one of the lower bars to clear. The quickstarts are barebones, there are no guides, examples for most things don’t really exist, and the most useful part of it is the reference page which is just everything all at once. I would be very happy if we did better than that and, hopefully, we will with more people working on it!
Yeah, I’ve checked out snowfall a ton, but could never get a derivation working because the docs were really sparse. I’d like to write some but I’d need some help understanding it first lmao
Our configuration is nice, but also not a particularly common use-case. I think the lessons we’ve learned will be more useful for writing something simple than what we have actually written
Still, no problems with people pulling from it… probably we should relicense under whatever we’re putting templates under
Sure, but this is our license. We licensed it under AGPL (our default). We should talk to Pinea about changing that to MIT if we want to let Aux pull from it.